Measuring Logs and Lumber

Source from :- See more at: http://www.woodweb.com/knowledge_base/Measuring_Logs_and_Lumber.html#sthash.UOIKuHBG.dpuf

The fact is that all of the above methods have been used to measure logs. The end result is that there are over 100 different log measurement (or estimation?) techniques, called log rules, in the U.S. and Canada. There are three widely used log rules, however—Scribner, Doyle, and International. Let’s look at these three rules in more detail.

International
Of all the log rules, the International 1/4-Inch Log Rule is the rule that comes closest to estimating the actual lumber footage that is in a log. The rule uses 1/4-inch kerf. It is approximately as accurate with smaller logs as with larger logs. However, because such a rule requires log prices to be based on diameter in order to accommodate the extra handling expense from smaller logs, this rule is not widely used by sawmillers.

Scribner
The Scribner Rule is widely used in the East and North. Its estimates are based on fitting rectangles into a circle. It does under-estimate the volume from smaller logs.

Doyle
The Doyle rule is widely used in the Southern U.S. Although empirically based, the estimates are quite close to the Scribner Rule.

Using a log rule
All the major log rules use the small end diameter, inside the bark, as the basic size measurement; this diameter is called the Scaling diameter. If the log is not perfectly round, then two readings are taken at 90 degrees to each other and averaged. Many rules will stipulate that the diameters are measured to the closest inch, and if the average of two diameters is exactly on the half, round up once and then round down the next time. In any case, the diameter measurements are supposed to represent a cone; butt swell, dipsy-doodles, or other small weird protuberances or depressions would be ignored.

The log length is the length to the last full foot (especially for hardwood logs); do not round up to the next foot. Softwoods are often measured to the last full even foot (i.e., 8, 10, 12, etc.). Hardwoods used to be measured to the even foot, but not so much anymore.

What about log defects, like a squirrel hole, fire scar, forks, or ?? The person measuring the log, often called a scaler, may decide that the last two feet of a log is not useful and will then scale the log as being 10 feet long instead of 12 feet actually measured. Or if there is a bad defect on one side, the scaled footage can be reduced proportionately. For gentle sweep (or crook), there are tables that indicate how much to deduct from the scaled answer.

In most cases, the footage numbers are given to the closest 10 BF (sometimes to the closest 5 BF; very seldom would the footage be more precise). Because all the numbers then will end in zero, the results are sometimes given without the zeros-­for example, 240 BF is given as 24. With such a procedure, the log rule will have the word “decimal” added to it.

Make it simple?
There are some people who believe that such a complicated scaling system for logs should be made easier. The way to do that is to measure the diameter at both ends of the log and also the actual length. Then, using the basic formula for volume of a cone (7th grade geometry class?), then we could figure out the cubic footage—oops, I mean cubic meters. In fact, the U.S. Forest Service now requires timber sales to be in cubic metric values. Of course, conversion between the “old” system and metric system is nearly impossible, unless you know diameters, log rules, etc. In other words, 10,000 cubic meters of pulpwood logs will have very little board footage compared to 10,000 cubic meters of 20″ diameter and larger logs. (Plus, I learned the “old” way of scaling and I am not anxious to change at my age!)

Actual numbers
There are three ways to get the actual footage number.

Tables
The footage values have been tabulated for the three rules for different diameters and lengths. Simply, look up the numbers. (A few sample numbers are given in Table 1. A tabular listing is available in the archives at WOODWEB and perhaps other Internet Sites, in many forestry books, and at many state forestry offices. Many logging and sawmill machinery companies also provide log scale information.) Often a tabular value is the preferred technique with today’s fast computers.

Formula
A second method is to use a formula that represents the log rule; often one rule may have several slightly different formulas. These formulas use diameter (D) and length (L) with volume (V) in board feet.

Scribner is V = (0.0494 x D x D x L) – (0.124 x D x L) – (0.269 x L)

International is V = 0.905 x ( – ) for every 4 foot length of log.

Doyle is V = / 16

Doyle is also V = +

Scaling Stick
A third method, and the most common, is to use a scaling stick. This is a piece of wood (about 1/4 inch thick and 1-1/2 inches wide) that has the footage numbers printed on the stick. The numbers are located on the stick at the spot that represents the diameter for that number. (For example, a 16″ diameter log that is 16 feet long scales as 360 BF; the number 360 will be located 16 inches from the end of the stick.) There will be several sets of numbers representing different log lengths. The stick is held up to the end of the log (running across the log measuring the diameter) with one end of the stick at the edge of the bark and wood. Where the bark and wood cross the other end of the stick, the appropriate number scale is read to determine the footage. (Here is how I measure oval logs with a scaling stick: The diameter is measured at the largest spot and then I mark this measurement on my stick holding my fingernail at the correct spot. Then I move the stick to measure at 90 degrees and note the second (and smaller) diameter reading. I then move my fingernail to a spot halfway between the first and second readings and use that spot for getting the footage value.)


Table 1. A selection of scaling values for Scribner, Doyle and International 1/4-Inch Rule for a 12 foot straight log.

Diameter
Scribner
Doyle
International
(Inches)
—Board Feet—
6
10
5
10
10
30
30
50
16
120
110
130
22
250
240
260

– See more at: http://www.woodweb.com/knowledge_base/Measuring_Logs_and_Lumber.html#sthash.UOIKuHBG.dpuf

Check Also

New Zealand ranked first in China’s radiata pine logs

In the first quarter, New Zealand ranked first in China’s radiata pine logs, accounting for …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *